linux-kernel - Re: Why is this patch not in 2.6.22-rc5?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070619.150437.38693228.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jeff@...zik.org
Cc:	shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, fubar@...ibm.com,
	da-x@...atomic.org, ctindel@...rs.sourceforge.net,
	kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Why is this patch not in 2.6.22-rc5?

From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:52:14 -0400

> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:36:30 -0700
> > Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> 	The following patch (based on a patch from Stephen Hemminger
> >> <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>) removes use after free conditions in
> >> the unregister path for the bonding master.  Without this patch, an
> >> operation of the form "echo -bond0 > /sys/class/net/bonding_masters"
> >> would trigger a NULL pointer dereference in sysfs.  I was not able to
> >> induce the failure with the non-sysfs code path, but for consistency I
> >> updated that code as well.
> >>
> >> 	I also did some testing of the bonding /proc file being open
> >> while the bond is being deleted, and didn't see any problems there.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
> > 	
> > Hey David, this patch fixes one of the bugs listed in 2.6.22-rc5
> > list. Jay submitted last week but it hasn't made it upstream.
> 
> Get him to forward it to me, like he does for other bonding patches...

Yes, this patch definitely should go via Jeff, he handles merging the
bonding bits.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/