[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200706200031.07082.m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:31:05 +0200
From: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: And now for something _totally_ different: Linux v2.6.22-rc5
> > MAINTAINERS says riscom8 is orphaned so not sure
> > if anybody cares. Spotted this when playing with modprobe
> > walking /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel in a loop ;)
>
> Oh wow.
>
> I wonder why it does that. The code literally does:
>
> save_flags(flags);
> cli();
> tty_unregister_driver(riscom_driver);
> put_tty_driver(riscom_driver);
> restore_flags(flags);
>
> and I don't see the point.
>
> (And that's what then causes the warning: tty_unregister_driver will
> eventually get a mutex, but the caller had disabled hardware interrupts..
>
> I see absolutely *zero* reason for that whole save_flags/cli/restore_flags
> dance at all, so I think the right thing to do is to just remove it.
>
> I'm Cc'ing Alan, in case he cares.
>
> Mariusz, if you actually *use* the dang thing, and really care, you can
> send me a tested patch. I can pretty much guarantee that removing those
> irq games won't make things any worse, but no way am I going to just
> remove it on my own without any users or any testing.
Unfortunately I can test it only the way I did it so far. That means no real
hardware :-/ This also implies I do care but not that much ;-) If you want any
patches to be tested that way -> feel free to mail me.
Mariusz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists