[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706191533580.7633@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch 10/26] SLUB: Faster more efficient slab determination
for __kmalloc.
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
> Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 02:58:48 -0700
> > > clameter@....com wrote:
> > >
> > > > + BUG_ON(KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE > 256 ||
> > > > + (KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE & (KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE - 1)));
> > >
> > > BUILD_BUG_ON?
> > >
> > Does not matter. That code is __init.
>
> Finding out at compile time is better.
Ok and BUILD_BUG_ON really works? Had some bad experiences with it.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/mm/slub.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2.orig/mm/slub.c 2007-06-19 15:36:57.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/mm/slub.c 2007-06-19 15:37:05.000000000 -0700
@@ -3079,7 +3079,7 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
* Make sure that nothing crazy happens if someone starts tinkering
* around with ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN
*/
- BUG_ON(KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE > 256 ||
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE > 256 ||
(KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE & (KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE - 1)));
for (i = 8; i < KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE;i++)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists