[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070620134148.GT10008@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:41:48 -0400
From: lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>
Cc: Bron Gondwana <brong@...tmail.fm>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>, david@...g.hm,
Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 04:26:34PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> If the bug is in the non-GPLed BIOS, not in the GPLed code, too bad.
> One more reason to dislike non-Free Software.
Maybe the Tivo only loading signed kernels is a bug in their bios. :)
> The freedom the GPL defends is not the freedom to modify and debug the
> system, but rather the covered software.
>
> Now, if you find evidence that the "bug" is actually intentionally put
> there to stop you from doing what you wanted with the software, then
> there's clearly a violation of the spirit of the license, and you
> might even have a case of copyright infringement, but IANAL.
There are many interesting bugs out there. Who is to say what was
intensional?
--
Len Sorensen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists