[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070620140443.GV10008@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:04:43 -0400
From: lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>
Cc: David Schwartz <davids@...master.com>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:12:57PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Aah, good question. Here's what the draft says about this:
>
> Mere interaction with a user through a computer network, with no
> transfer of a copy, is not conveying.
>
> The requirements as to "installation information" apply to conveying
> the program along with a user product.
So if I go use a computer running some GPL software, and I copy the
contents of /bin to a CD and bring it home, does the owner of the
machine now owe me a copy of the GPL sources?
--
Len Sorensen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists