linux-kernel - Re: SMP read() stopping at memory page boundaries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2c0942db0706200922i15ce44b0xceaed95d002dba33@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:22:20 -0700
From:	"Ray Lee" <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
To:	"Timo Sirainen" <tss@....fi>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SMP read() stopping at memory page boundaries

On 6/20/07, Timo Sirainen <tss@....fi> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 17:52 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Sometimes read() returns only 4096 bytes. I'm locking the file, so I
> > don't think this should ever happen, right?

man 2 read

read() is always allowed to return less than you asked for. You need
to go back and ask for the rest. That's why people wrap read() and
write() in loops, and use those wrapped versions instead.

> read() sometimes returns 4096 bytes but with the "1111" already included
> in the data.

Uhm, do you mean 'without the 1111'? 4096 with the 1111 sounds
perfectly fine. (Though 4096 without the 1111 is also perfectly fine.)

> Is there a way to avoid this without locking the file while
> reading? The "1111" tries to act as a kind of a lock.

I think you've misunderstood how read and write work. pread and pwrite
are no different in this respect -- they just allow an atomic
seek+read/write.

Ray
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/