[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <467957CB.8020704@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:37:31 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
CC: Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: JIT emulator needs
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>
> I presumed an ELF note or extended filesystem attributes were already
> in place for this sort of affair. It may be that the model implemented
> is so restrictive that users are forbidden to create new executables,
> in which case using a different model is certainly in order. Otherwise
> the ELF note or attributes need to be implemented.
>
Another thing to keep in mind, since we're talking about security
policies in the first place, is that anything like this *MUST* be
"opt-in" on the part of the security policy, because what we're talking
about is circumventing an explicit security policy just based on a
user-provided binary saying, in effect, "don't worry, I know what I'm
doing."
Changing the meaning of an established explicit security policy is not
acceptable.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists