| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 01:08:04 +0800 From: Tim Post <tim.post@...kinetics.net> To: Andrew McKay <amckay@...rs.ca> Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@...nline.de>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>, david@...g.hm, Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 11:27 -0500, Andrew McKay wrote: > I'm not going to address whether GPLv3 changed the spirit of GPLv2, but saying > that licensing the Linux Kernel under GPLv3 will result in more contributions is > absolute BS. Is there a system in place that sort of keeps track? Argument aside, I'm really interested to see how adoption in devices encourages contributions (and what kinds of contributions it attracts). Anyone would be I guess. How do you guys keep up with it? My head almost blows up just thinking about it given the traffic of just _this_ list. TIA :) --Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists