[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46795F90.5030602@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:10:40 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Bryan Henderson <hbryan@...ibm.com>
CC: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan <alan@...eserver.org>,
Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>,
Jack Stone <jack@...keye.stone.uk.eu.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Versioning file system
Bryan Henderson wrote:
>> The directory is quite visible with a standard 'ls -a'. Instead,
>> they simply mark it as a separate volume/filesystem: i.e. the fsid
>> differs when you call stat(). The whole thing ends up acting rather like
>> our bind mounts.
>
> Hmm. So it breaks user space quite a bit. By break, I mean uses that
> work with more conventional filesystems stop working if you switch to
> NetAp. Most programs that operate on directory trees willingly cross
> filesystems, right? Even ones that give you an option, such as GNU cp,
> don't by default.
>
> But if the implementation is, as described, wildly successful, that means
> users are willing to tolerate this level of breakage, so it could be used
> for versioning too.
>
> But I think I'd rather see a truly hidden directory for this (visible only
> when looked up explicitly).
>
When I administered a bunch of netapps I remember turning the visible
.snapshots off.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists