[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46797747.9020904@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:51:51 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>
CC: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: JIT emulator needs
Albert Cahalan wrote:
> Putting this into the security policy was an error born of
> lazyness to begin with. Abuse of the security mechanism
> was easier than hacking the toolchain, ELF loader, etc.
>
> Either a binary needs self-modification, or it doesn't. This is
> determined by the author of the code. If you don't trust an
> executable that needs this ability, then you simply can not
> run it in a useful way.
That's fine. That's a policy decision. That's what a security policy
*is*. The owner of the system has decided, by security policy, that
that is not allowed. Bypassing that is not acceptable.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists