[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46797CB1.8070008@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:14:57 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ak@...e.de, gregkh@...e.de, muli@...ibm.com, ashok.raj@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, clameter@....com
Subject: Re: [Intel IOMMU 06/10] Avoid memory allocation failures in dma map
api calls
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> So a reclaim context (kswapd and direct reclaim) set PF_MEMALLOC to
> ensure they themselves will not block on a memory allocation. And it is
> understood that these code paths have a bounded memory footprint.
that's a too simplistic view though; what happens is that kswapd will
queue the IO, but the irq context will then take the IO from the queue
and do the DMA mapping... which needs the memory.....
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists