[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e6659dd0706201302s6c83998fy96227e864ae55b9b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:02:44 -0300
From: "Tomas Neme" <lacrymology@...il.com>
To: "Michael Poole" <mdpoole@...ilus.org>
Cc: "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
> A "computer program" is a set of statements or instructions to be
> used directly or indirectly in a computer in order to bring about
> a certain result.
> -- US Code, Title 17, Section 101
so?
Not GPL related, but casino machine software that needs to be approved
by the casino regulation office in Argentina need to provide source,
compiling instructions AND binaries, and the binaries must pass a diff
check. This is impossible without a hacked compiler since the
timestamps WILL differ.
Just an example that legality doesn't always comply with itself, and
even less make sense.
T
--
|_|0|_|
|_|_|0|
|0|0|0|
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists