[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <orsl8mtkb9.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:58:18 -0300
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Anders Larsen <al@...rsen.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>, david@...g.hm,
Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Jun 20, 2007, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>
>>> b) the manufacturer is able to update the device _in_ _the_ _field_.
>> Sure, it would be more costly, but it's not like the
>> law (or the agreements in place) *mandate* tivoization.
> The sad part is that the FCC, especially, are pretty fond of doing
> exactly that.
<broken-record>
It does not mandate the use of *copyleft* Free Software in non-ROM
such a way that the user cannot modify it.
</broken-record>
> This comes more from a general cluelessness about technology
And the meaning of tivoization ;-)
Tivoization doesn't mean "user can't modify". It's more than that.
But I agree with the feeling. It's like mandating knife manufacturers
to design ways to stop people from hurting or killing others with
knives. So much for self defense...
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@...dhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@...d.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists