[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070620001850.GV86004887@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:18:50 +1000
From: David Chinner <dgc@....com>
To: David Greaves <david@...eaves.com>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@....com>, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
David Robinson <zxvdr.au@...il.com>,
LVM general discussion and development
<linux-lvm@...hat.com>,
"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
xfs@....sgi.com, linux-pm <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>,
LinuxRaid <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:24:23AM +0100, David Greaves wrote:
> David Greaves wrote:
> so I cd'ed out of /scratch and umounted.
>
> I then tried the xfs_check.
>
> haze:~# xfs_check /dev/video_vg/video_lv
> ERROR: The filesystem has valuable metadata changes in a log which needs to
> be replayed. Mount the filesystem to replay the log, and unmount it before
> re-running xfs_check. If you are unable to mount the filesystem, then use
> the xfs_repair -L option to destroy the log and attempt a repair.
> Note that destroying the log may cause corruption -- please attempt a mount
> of the filesystem before doing this.
> haze:~# mount /scratch/
> haze:~# umount /scratch/
> haze:~# xfs_check /dev/video_vg/video_lv
>
> Message from syslogd@...e at Tue Jun 19 08:47:30 2007 ...
> haze kernel: Bad page state in process 'xfs_db'
I think we can safely say that your system is hosed at this point ;)
> ugh. Try again
> haze:~# xfs_check /dev/video_vg/video_lv
> haze:~#
zero output means no on-disk corruption was found. Everything is
consistent on disk, so that seems to indicate something in memory has been
crispy fried by the suspend/resume....
> Dave, I ran xfs_check -v... but I got bored when it reached 122M of bz2
> compressed output with no sign of stopping... still got it if it's any
> use...
No, not useful. It's a log of every operation it does and so is really
only useful for debugging xfs-check problems ;)
> I then rebooted and ran a repair which didn't show any damage.
Not surprising as your first check showed no damage.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists