linux-kernel - Re: Change in default vm_dirty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1182328536.21117.24.camel@twins>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:35:36 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Change in default vm_dirty_ratio

On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 21:44 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Anyway, this is all arse-about.  What is the design?  What algorithms
> do we need to implement to do this successfully?  Answer me that, then
> we can decide upon these implementation details.

Building on the per BDI patches, how about integrating feedback from the
full-ness of device queues. That is, when we are happily doing IO and we
cannot possibly saturate the active devices (as measured by their queue
never reaching 75%?) then we can safely increase the total dirty limit.

OTOH, when even with the per BDI dirty limit the device queue is
constantly saturated (contended) we ought to lower the total dirty
limit.

Lots of detail here to work out, but does this sound workable?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/