[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706210031280.31603@asgard.lang.hm>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: david@...g.hm
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>
cc: Andrew McKay <amckay@...rs.ca>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@...nline.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>,
Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 21, 2007, david@...g.hm wrote:
>
>> no, one of the rules for the network is that the software must be
>> certified,
>
> In this case you might have grounds to enforce this restriction of the
> network on the network controller itself, I suppose.
how would the network controller know if the software has been modified?
> Not that you should disable the network controller entirely (this
> would render the computer useless for many other purpose unrelated
> with blocking connections to your network).
>
> You could instead arrange for the network controller to send some
> signal that enables the network to recognize that the device is
> running certified software.
what sort of signal can the network controller send that couldn't be
forged by the OS?
how would you do this where the device is a receiver on the netwoek (such
as a satellite receiver)
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists