[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1182436606.2863.12.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:36:46 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ian McDonald <ian.mcdonald@...di.co.nz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Bj?rn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>,
William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
"S. P. Prasanna" <prasanna@...ibm.com>,
Antonino Daplas <adaplas@...il.com>,
Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>, Ville Syrj?l? <syrjala@....fi>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Rudolf Marek <r.marek@...embler.cz>,
Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@....de>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches
> Shouldn't we add something to the help texts?
>
> + This option also marks kernel text pages as write-protected,
> + except if you enable KPROBES.
>
> CMIIW.
>
> As mentioned elsewhere in this thread, replacing CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA by
> CONFIG_WRITEPROTECT_RODATA and CONFIG_WRITEPROTECT_TEXT might be a
> better idea. The latter should be mutual exclusive with CONFIG_KPROBES.
lets do the minimal now for 2.6.22, and do it right for .23 please
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists