linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Move functions declarations to header file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070621084101.73254fe7.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:41:01 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move functions declarations to header file

On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:54:11 -0300 Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:

> Some interrupt entry points are currently defined in i8259.c
> They probably belong in a header. Right now, their only user is
> init_IRQ, justifying their declaration in-file. But when virtualization
> comes in, we may be interested in using that functions in late
> initializations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>

Patch is OK with me, but please insert patches inline in emails.
Lots of people who use mutt do this, so it must work and is the
preferred way.

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/