lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0706210845090.3593@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, cebbert@...hat.com,
	chris@...ee.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] long freezes on thinkpad t60



On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> what worries me a bit though is that my patch that made spinlocks 
> equally agressive to that loop didnt solve the hangs!

Your parch kept doing "spin_trylock()", didn't it?

That's a read-modify-write thing, and keeps bouncing the cacheline back 
and forth, and together with the fact that even *after* you get the 
spinlock the "wait_for_inactive()" would actually end up looping back, 
releasing it, and re-getting it.

So the problem was that "wait_for_inactive()" kept the lock (because it 
actually *got* it), and looped over getting it, and because it was an 
exclusive cacheline ownership, that implies that somebody else is not 
getting it, and is kept from ever getting it.

So trying to use "trylock" doesn't help. It still has all the same bad 
sides - it still gets the lock (getting the lock wasn't the problem: 
_holding_ the lock was the problem), and it still kept the cache line for 
the lock on one core.

The only way to avoid lock contention is to avoid any exclusive use at 
all.

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ