[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200706211801.05834.agruen@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:01:05 +0200
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Crispin Cowan <crispin@...ell.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, jjohansen@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching
On Saturday 16 June 2007 01:49, Greg KH wrote:
> But for those types of models that do not map well to internal kernel
> structures, perhaps they should be modeled on top of a security system that
> does handle the internal kernel representation of things in the way the
> kernel works.
How exactly are struct vfsmount and struct dentry not in-kernel structures?
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists