[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070621203843.044fd19a@hyperion.delvare>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:38:43 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...ightbb.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@....cz>
Subject: Re: Writing a driver for a legacy serial device
Hi David,
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:47:12 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 11:33 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > OK. This leads me to a question: is it OK for me to add support for my
> > non-input device to inputattach, or is a separate, dedicated helper
> > tool preferred? Both ways are fine with me, I don't know what the
> > input subsystem maintainers expect.
>
> You might do better to implement it as a line discipline instead.
> Or just do it in userspace. What exactly are you trying to do?
I am writing a driver for a TAOS evaluation module. This device is a
limited SMBus master, connecting to the serial port. The evaluation
chip is connected to the SMBus. In my case this is a TSL2550 light
sensor, but virtually all compatible TAOS evaluation modules could be
supported.
I2C bus drivers have to be implemented in the kernel, so user-space
isn't an option for me.
I just posted a first (working) version of my driver, if you want to
take a look:
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c/2007-June/001508.html
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists