[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <orbqf9ksi1.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:38:30 -0300
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>
To: davids@...master.com
Cc: <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Linux-Kernel\@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Jun 21, 2007, "David Schwartz" <davids@...master.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:55:10 -0700
>> "David Schwartz" <davids@...master.com> wrote:
>> > A key is a number. A signature is a number. They are neither
>> > statements nor
>> > instructions. The argument that GPLv2 prohibits Tivoization is
>> > really and
>> > truly absurd. It has neither a legal nor a moral leg to stand on.
>> A computer program is a number too.
> No, it's not. It can be expressed as a number, but it is not a number.
By this logic, then a key is a key, and a signature is a signature.
They can be expressed as numbers, sure.
> A computer program is a set of instructions to accomplish a particular
> result. It can be expressed as a number, but that doesn't mean it is a
> number.
A key is an input to a cryptographical algorithm, and a signature is
an output. I could try to come up with more creative definitions, but
you get the idea already.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@...dhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@...d.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists