[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sl8l14d8.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:42:27 +0100
From: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Adding subroot information to /proc/mounts, or obtaining that through other means
On 21 Jun 2007, Miklos Szeredi said:
> I'm working on this actually. See this (and related patches) in -mm:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc4/2.6.22-rc4-mm2/broken-out/unprivileged-mounts-add-user-mounts-to-the-kernel.patch
>
> This solves the "user=" thing, but is not a generic solution for other
> options. And I'm wondering if there is really a need for that.
I'm not sure there is, actually...
> Which quota options are you thinking about? Some quota options
> (e.g. for ext*) seem to be already present in /proc/mounts.
... last I checked, usrquota and grpquota weren't being propagated in,
but that's changed sometime in the last, um, wow, has it been two
years already? Perhaps I should have checked again before babbling
nonsense to an audience of thousands, sorry!
> Do you know any other options which are only in /etc/mtab, and need to
> be stored along with each mount?
None presently, but in general it seems strange to have to modify the
kernel in order to be able to reliably associate some new key/value pair
with a mount point, let alone to have to do it on a filesystem-by-
filesystem basis...
--
`... in the sense that dragons logically follow evolution so they would
be able to wield metal.' --- Kenneth Eng's colourless green ideas sleep
furiously
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists