[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070621195247.GF18990@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:52:47 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: david@...g.hm
Cc: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@...e.de>,
Crispin Cowan <crispin@...ell.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, jjohansen@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching
Hi!
> >>The code has improved, and continues to improve, to meet all the coding
> >>style feedback except the bits which are essential to AA's function
> >
> >Which are exactly the bits Christoph Hellwig and Al Viro
> >vetoed. http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0706.1/2587.html
> >. I believe it takes more than "2 users want it" to overcome veto of
> >VFS maintainer.
>
> so you are saying that _any_ pathname based solution is not acceptable to
> the kernel, no matter what?
You'd have to ask Christoph the same question.
AFAICT, reconstructing full path then basing security on that is a
no-no.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists