[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ortzt1jd7j.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:54:08 -0300
From:	Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>
To:	david@...g.hm
Cc:	Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
	Michael Poole <mdpoole@...ilus.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Tomas Neme <lacrymology@...il.com>,
	"Linux-Kernel\@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Jun 21, 2007, david@...g.hm wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>> You can't use this code if you cooporate with anyone that requires
>> DRM systems.
> I think their earlier versions did say this.
Show me a GPLv3 draft that did it?
Start here, section 3:
http://gplv3.fsf.org/gpl-draft-2006-01-16.html
> DRM does have some legitimate uses, for example redhat installations
> not installing unsigned software is a form of DRM
Doh.  Then chmod og-r is DRM too.  And stronger DRM while at that,
since the user denied permission to read the file cannot take it back,
whereas the verification of unsigned software is just a warning, that
you can often bypass by telling the software to go ahead and install
it regardless of signatures.
-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member         http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@...dhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@...d.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
