[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0706211304480.3593@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, chris@...ee.ca,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] long freezes on thinkpad t60
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> I can understand why no data is saved by this change: gcc is aligning 
> the next field to a natural boundary anyway and we dont really have 
> arrays of spinlocks (fortunately).
Actually, some data structures could well shrink.
Look at "struct task_struct", for example. Right now it has two spinlocks 
right next to each other (alloc_lock and pi_lock).
Other data structures may have things like bitfields etc.
But yeah, I'd not expect that to be very common, and in some cases you 
might have to re-order data structures to take advantage of better 
packing, and even then it's probably not all that noticeable.
> but this is certainly not something for 2.6.22, it's an early 2.6.23 
> matter i suspect.
Oh, absolutely.
		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
