linux-kernel - Re: [locking api] It's ok?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070621204923.GA5171@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:49:23 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, miklos@...redi.hu
Subject: Re: [locking api] It's ok?


* Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@...il.com> wrote:

> Hello!
> 
> In all kernel version on my system already see this locking api 
> result:

it's OK:

> --------------------------------------------------------
> 145 out of 218 testcases failed, as expected. |
> ----------------------------------------------------

if you want a 'perfect' result and full checking, turn this option on:

 # CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is not set

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/