| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1182469541.2704.13.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:45:40 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com> Cc: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>, Zolt?n HUBERT <zoltan.hubert@...ero.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please release a stable kernel Linux 3.0 On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 19:08 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > On 06/21/2007 07:01 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 06:34:20PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > >> Even the good ones that get lots of fixes aren't all that good. The > >> biggest problem ATM is that suspend is badly broken and keeps getting > >> worse... > > > > I wasn't under the impression suspend had really ever worked. Such a > > messy problem to solve. > > > > It never worked reliably for everyone, but with each new release it > seems to get worse. the thing is just fundamentally not designed right. Declaring it stable ain't gonna fix that. Having someone do a right design (which will obviously will go through some breakage period, even if it's an evolution of the current design) is a required step of getting s/r more reliable... but the current one doesn't get stable just by declaring it so. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists