[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <467A0474.809@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:54:12 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Bob Picco <bob.picco@...com>
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mm snapshot broken-out-2007-06-20-10-12.tar.gz uploaded
Bob Picco wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote: [Wed Jun 20 2007, 09:07:11PM EDT]
>> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:51:22 -0400 Bob Picco wrote:
>>
>>> akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote: [Wed Jun 20 2007, 01:14:34PM EDT]
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> Build breakage. pci_mmcfg_late_init is for i386.
>> then you want CONFIG_X86_32 instead of CONFIG_X86.
>> CONFIG_X86 is set/true for both X86_32 and X86_64.
> Then what I stated within the patch description is incorrect. pci.h which is the
> required include for the declaration is conditionally for CONFIG_X86. So it is
> both I guess?
Yes.
> bob
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bob Picco <bob.picco@...com>
>>>
>>> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> Index: linux-2.6.22-rc5-mm1/drivers/acpi/bus.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- linux-2.6.22-rc5-mm1.orig/drivers/acpi/bus.c 2007-06-20 14:09:07.000000000 -0400
>>> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc5-mm1/drivers/acpi/bus.c 2007-06-20 20:32:00.000000000 -0400
>>> @@ -757,7 +757,9 @@ static int __init acpi_init(void)
>>> result = acpi_bus_init();
>>>
>>> if (!result) {
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
>>> pci_mmcfg_late_init();
>>> +#endif
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_LEGACY
>>> if (!PM_IS_ACTIVE())
>>> pm_active = 1;
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists