[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706221036460.26568@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:41:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: david@...g.hm
cc: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
Zoltán HUBERT <zoltan.hubert@...ero.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please release a stable kernel Linux 3.0
On Jun 21 2007 16:32, david@...g.hm wrote:
>>
>> For my part, I think the 2.6.<odd> did not go as well as the 2.6.<even>,
>> beginning with x=16.
>
> you misunderstood the even/odd it was never 2.x.y with y odd/even being stable
> / development, it was the x being even/odd to indicate stable / development.
>
> all 2.6.x are stable, all 2.5.x were development.
[2.even.x stable, 2.odd.x development]
True dat. But it _feels_ like 2.6.odd is becoming developmental.
(The good thing however is that there's a 2.6.even quite shortly after a
2.6.odd ;-))
So basically it's like "a good kernel every 4 months".
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists