[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070622100216.45abf2b3@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:02:16 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc: bzolnier@...il.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] schedule BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA for removal
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 01:52:11 +0200
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> wrote:
> Users should use the libata based drivers for SATA drives.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
>
> ---
> --- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt.old 2007-06-21 23:41:03.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt 2007-06-21 23:42:03.000000000 +0200
> @@ -347,3 +347,10 @@
> Who: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
>
> ---------------------------
> +
> +What: CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA
> +When: December 2007
> +Why: users should use the libata based drivers for SATA
> +Who: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
> +
> +---------------------------
NAK this for now
For the standard SATA controllers it is probably true now and will
definitely be true by December 2007 but there is lots of stuff out there
which uses SATA/PATA bridges on older PATA controllers such as the
VIA and HPT controllers. While support for them varies between rock solid
(VIA) and passable (HPT), I don't think its yet time to bump those people
towards libata forcibly at all.
About the only thing this would meaningfully obsolete would be
ide/pci/siimage.c for SI3112 and some PCI identifiers from ide/pci/piix.c.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists