linux-kernel - Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a9e22dff0706220439m4bc70a30i8cc83fe92cff8bc9@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:39:50 +0300
From:	"Ni@m" <niam.niam@...il.com>
To:	"Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

> We have patches for "very high non-preempt latency in
> context_struct_compute_av()" and "list_add corruption. prev->next
> should be next (f7d28794), but was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug
> at lib/list_debug.c:33", but both are too intrusive.
>
> Anyway, those bugs are not regressions.
>

Are you going to release 2.6.22 with this bugs?? But question wasn't
on this subject ...
The question was "why linux kernel release should have some bugs that
would be fixed fixed in future?"
Let's wait and publish kernel w/o known bugs. Let's wait for some
time, let's publish 2.6.22-rc_last, test it for some time(2 weeks for
example), fix bugs if any and after _test_period_of_whole_kernel_ but
not _separate_patches/parts_ of kernel release stable one!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/