linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] clocksouce implementation for powerpc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <467BC398.1000506@ru.mvista.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:42:00 +0400
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To:	Tony Breeds <tony@...eyournoodle.com>
Cc:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LinuxPPC-dev <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC] clocksouce implementation for powerpc

Tony Breeds wrote:

> 	Thanks for taking the time to look over my patch.

>>   I guess it's been based on the prior work by John Stultz (and me too :-)?

> At some level I guess so.  John did send me a patch a while ago.

>>   If you mean the init. part, this has been already done by me -- I've 
>>implemented read_persistent_clock() and got rid of xtime setting. What's 
>>left is to implemet update_persistent_clock() and get rid of 
>>timer_check_rtc()...

> Actually I think that comment is redundant.  and should be removed
> sorry.

    I guess you haven't looked thru the -rt patch? There's much more than 
John's initial patch there now, including the clockevents driver.

>>>+	.mult         = 0,	/* To be filled in */
>>>+	.read         = NULL,   /* To be filled in */
>>>+	.settimeofday = NULL,   /* To be filled in */
>>
>>   I don't quite understand why not just init them right away?  The values 
>>are fixed anyways.

> Well at least mult needs to be calculated at runtime, and I prefer to

    I was talking about the method intializers specifically.

> have the structure near the top of the file at which stage the
> read/settimeofday functions aren't defined.

    I don't think it's justified anyway.

> Yours Tony

WBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/