linux-kernel - Re: Terrible IO performance when using 4GB of RAM on a 32 bit machine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <467BDE8A.8040609@shaw.ca>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:36:58 -0600
From:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To:	Peter Rabbitson <rabbit@...bit.us>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Terrible IO performance when using 4GB of RAM on a 32 bit machine

Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> Robert Hancock wrote:
>> Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>>> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What does /proc/mtrr look like in the two cases?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Identical for mem=3900 and without it.
>>>
>>> reg00: base=0x00000000 (   0MB), size=2048MB: write-back, count=1
>>> reg01: base=0x80000000 (2048MB), size=1024MB: write-back, count=1
>>> reg02: base=0xc0000000 (3072MB), size= 512MB: write-back, count=1
>>> reg03: base=0xe0000000 (3584MB), size= 256MB: write-back, count=1
>>> reg04: base=0xf0000000 (3840MB), size= 128MB: write-back, count=1
>>> reg05: base=0xf8000000 (3968MB), size=  32MB: write-back, count=1
>>
>> Looks like another case of bad MTRRs on an Intel motherboard? The BIOS 
>> is marking only memory up to 4000MB as cacheable, but the actual 
>> memory extends up to about 4031MB. Therefore anything that accesses 
>> the top 31MB of memory will run very slow.
>>
> 
> Ah, it all makes sense now. In this case I assume mem=4000 is perfectly 
> safe and usable for the time being. In the beginning I tried with 
> mem=4g, which obviously did not work. If anyone is interested in adding 
> an exception/workaround for this particular motherboard, I'd be happy to 
> help with testing. I have added more information about the system: 
> current kernel config [1], output of `lspci -vv`[2], dmesg with 
> mem=4000[3].
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Peter

There was a patch floating around recently to detect the case where the 
MTRRs don't map all of RAM as write-back, automatically cap the memory 
used by the kernel to what is mapped and print some loud warnings..

-- 
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@...pamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/