linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -rt] CONFIG_PARAVIRT and CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <467BF69D.4030806@goop.org>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:19:41 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] CONFIG_PARAVIRT and CONFIG_MCOUNT don't play well
 together

Chris Wright wrote:
> Yes, I agree, it's actually documenting the subtlety of the calling
> convention, not just noise in the source.  The upstream patch is
> different, I'll sort one out.

I wonder if we should use something like "regparm" rather than 
"fastcall"?  The latter makes it sound like its just a performance issue.

    J

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/