[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1182533502.5493.88.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:31:42 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Convert all tasklets to workqueues
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:16 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> So patches 1-4 all look fine to me. In fact, 5 looks ok too.
Great!
> Leaving patch 6 as a "only makes sense after we actually have some numbers
> about it", and patch 5 is a "could go either way" as far as I'm concerned
> (ie I could merge it together with the 1-4 series, but I think it's
> equally valid to just see it as a companion to 6).
Actually, in my next series, I removed patch 5 and just simply replace
the tasklets with the workqueue implementation, leaving no config
option. It will be out shortly, after I finish my testing.
I also keep the file name tasklet_work.c instead of overwriting
tasklet.c, just because it's easier to review the patch that way.
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists