[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070622183217.GA18265@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:32:17 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, matthew.wilcox@...com,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Convert all tasklets to workqueues
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 10:16:47AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > I just want to state that tasklets served their time well. But it's time
> > to give them an honorable discharge. So lets get rid of tasklets and
> > given them a standing salute as they leave :-)
>
> Well, independently of whether we actually discharge them or not, I do
> tend to always like things that split independent concepts up (whether
> they then end up being _implemented_ independently of each other or not is
> a separate issue).
>
> So patches 1-4 all look fine to me. In fact, 5 looks ok too.
I don't think we should put 3 and 4 in. The code in drm is just crap and
should just be rewritten. I'll cook up a patch, but I can't actually
yest it due to lack of hardware.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists