lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m14pkzbraz.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:41:24 -0600
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: disable the GART before allocate aperture

Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> writes:

> On Friday 22 June 2007 22:33, Alan Cox wrote:
>> You've got mapped live gart pages from the previous kernel. Even if you
>> disable the gart before a memset 
>
> It's probably too late then. It could also interfere with other operations.
> If anything the GART should be disabled during kexec shutdown. Perhaps we just 
> need a suitable suspend function that does that. Eric, any preferences? 

Well it would be a shutdown method not a suspend method.  The authors of
the suspend code thought sharing code with the reboot and the rmmod case
didn't make sense.

For a normal kexec into another kernel I think this makes sense.

>> you may well have the video card using 
>> gart translations and possibly live IOMMU mappings for devices using it
>> via bus mastering - and those will cause you MCE exceptions with a
>> corrupt cpu context flag (ie not nicely recoverable).
>
> We disable those machine checks on K8 because they're not fully reliable.

For the kexec on panic not shutting the hardware down if at all possible is
the ideal.  There I think we need a mode to not touch a chunk of the iommu
and reserve it for the kexec on panic kernel (or perhaps just use the
swiotlb code if we need bounce buffers at all).

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ