[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706230010330.26568@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:11:38 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>
cc: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@...akeasy.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linux and Kernel Video <video4linux-list@...hat.com>,
linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, toralf.foerster@....de,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Luca Risolia <luca.risolia@...dio.unibo.it>
Subject: Re: Kconfig troubles when using menuconfig - Was: [patch]Re:
[linux-usb-devel] linux-2.6.22-rc5-gf1518a0 build #300 failed in zc0301_core.c
On Jun 23 2007 02:50, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
> Ok, so we add this as solution 2.(c) to the reply I just sent to Jan :-)
>
> But I still prefer 2.(b) -- making the config scripts intelligent so that if a
> given "menuconfig FOO depends on BAR", then all the "config BAZ"s
> inside this menuconfig also automatically "depend on" BAR too.
> This is simpler in the long run because it requires least amount
> (actually none) of redundant typing and would continue to work in
> the future if/when the:
>
> menuconfig FOO
> if FOO
> ...
> endif # FOO
>
> idiom is converted to an:
>
> configmenu FOO
> ...
> endconfigmenu # FOO
>
> kind of idiom ...
Of course *this* *is* *the preferred* thing. (I think even Sam liked that one
better than the current menuconfig menuconfig confusion.) But, as always, you
need someone to code it, etc.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists