linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] Make DRM use the tasklet is-sched API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1182554886.3228.141.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:28:05 -0700
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, matthew.wilcox@...com,
	kuznet@....inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] Make DRM use the tasklet is-sched API

On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 00:38 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote:
> 
> > > The two patches have two different objectives, even though they are 
> > > related and currently on a 1 to 1 basis. The patches regardless, 
> > > should stay separate.
> > 
> > I'm not convinced yet .. One more stab?
> 
> uhm, i dont think Steve needs to 'convince' you. You have been (once 
> again ...) given extensive explanations about a really trivial topic, 
> but you keep pushing and demanding very agressively without apparently 
> reading the answers. If you dont want to or cannot understand it's 
> really your problem to solve, not Steve's ...

Your right Steven doesn't need to convince me. He requested comments and
I gave them, if he or you want to ignore them that's your prerogative.

How can you say I didn't read the answers .. I said "I read this 5
times" ! It doesn't get much more explicit than that .. In fact, my
response was mainly cause I thought his explanation was confusing.. How
can you fault _me_ for that, it's the medium we're using.

It seems like you assume all my emails are "demanding" and "aggressive",
where I'm just asking questions and making comments .. Who am I to be
making demands of anyone ?

<joke>
I DEMAND you do what I say! You better do it or else! I'll force Linus
to ignore you, so you better do it.
</joke>

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/