linux-kernel - Re: O_DIRECT, fdatasync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <467B6168.6090508@parvan.net>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:43:04 -0700
From:	Reza Roboubi <reza@...van.net>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: O_DIRECT, fdatasync_area, mwrite

Reza Roboubi wrote:
> Linus Torvalds:
>  > I suspect that this is about a few hundred lines of code (and a lot of
>  > testing). And you can emulate O_DIRECT behavior with it, along with
>  > splice (only for page-cache entities, though), and a lot of other
>  > off-by-one uses.
> ( http://lwn.net/2002/0516/a/lt-async.php3 )
> 
> I have often read this message and wondered why no one has implemented 
> it yet.  We would love to have such clean features instead of O_DIRECT. 
>  At this very moment it's a bit hard for us to do this(given a 
> prerequisites learning curve amongst other factors.)  We may at some 
> point do it and I'd love to contribute.  What _are_ the issues with it, 
>  and is there a technical reason it hasn't been implemented yet by anybody?
> 
> Further, is O_DIRECT to raw partition also unclean?

I know the top guys are very busy;  but I'd appreciate just a brief 
comment on the present situation.

Reza.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/