[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070623025906.GA24336@alinoe.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 04:59:06 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@...noe.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SATA Harddisk speed drop of 100 MB/s
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 10:31:32PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> for i in /sys/block/sd*/queue/scheduler ; do echo -n "scheduler for $i was:" ; cat $i ; echo anticipatory > $i ; done
>
> Should show you the scheduler for all libata/scsi discs, and switch to
> anticipatory. It probably works for hd* as well, but I don't have any
> around to test.
>
> I had ridiculous md raid performance (on resync) using cfq at least once.
> Unfortunately I never bothered trying to track it down, and I didn't check
> the throughput after the resync was done either. Also, I don't recall the
> kernel version, but it was either 2.6.18 or 2.6.20.
Just one kernel version? The problem here is in every
kernel revision after 551c012d7eea3dc5ec063c7ff9c718d39e77634f
2.6.20-rc2,rc3,rc4,rc5,rc6,rc7 ... 2.6.20 ... 2.6.21 ... 2.6.22-rc5
noop:
Timing buffered disk reads: 254 MB in 3.00 seconds = 84.66 MB/sec
anticipatory:
Timing buffered disk reads: 252 MB in 3.02 seconds = 83.43 MB/sec
deadline:
Timing buffered disk reads: 258 MB in 3.02 seconds = 85.41 MB/sec
cfq:
Timing buffered disk reads: 194 MB in 3.03 seconds = 64.06 MB/sec
The normal value is cfq. So, all other schedulars are somewhat faster,
but still far from the correct 165 MB/s.
--
Carlo Wood <carlo@...noe.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists