[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070623095215.f882f1cb.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:52:15 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ICH Force HPET: Make generic time capable of
switching broadcast timer
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:38:22 -0700 Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com> wrote:
> Auto-detect the presence of HPET on ICH5 or newer platforms and enable
> HPET for broadcast timer. This gives a bigger upperlimit for tickless time
> tick and improves the power consumption in comparison to PIT as broadcast timer.
>
> This patch:
>
> Change the broadcast timer, if a timer with higher rating becomes available.
>
so... is this the mysterious patchset which will get NOHZ working
on my little Vaio?
I _think_ what's going on here is that your code will go and poke the
hardware to enable the hpet even f the BIOS decided to hide its presence.
Is that correct? If so, perhaps the changelog should mention this
explicitly.
> Applies over linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2 +
> tglx's patch-2.6.22-rc4-mm2-hrt4 patch
Oh. Well that tears that then.
Thomas, can I assume that you'll send all this stuff back at me?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists