linux-kernel - Re: NAK (bashizm in the /bin/sh script): [PATCH v3] doc/oops-tracing: add Code: decode info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070623105645.ad4dbace.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:56:45 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NAK (bashizm in the /bin/sh script): [PATCH v3]
 doc/oops-tracing: add Code: decode info

On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:43:03 -0700 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:

> > NAK.
> 
> Sorry I slept thru another wonderful festival on LKML.

That's probably the best strategy.

> You don't have the authority to NAK the patch.

Yeah.  nak to naks.

> OTOH, you also didn't supply a patch.  If you do this, I'll be
> glad to consider it.  If I can read it, that is.

Yes, I plan on merging that patch as-is.  If it was a compulsory part of
kbuild then that would be a problem but as some optional tool I don't think
that a bashism matters much.  Someone can fix it sometime should they feel
so motivated.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/