[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <467D8AC9.8060001@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:04:09 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NAK (bashizm in the /bin/sh script): [PATCH v3] doc/oops-tracing:
add Code: decode info
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 10:56:45AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:43:03 -0700 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> NAK.
>>> Sorry I slept thru another wonderful festival on LKML.
>> That's probably the best strategy.
>>
>>> You don't have the authority to NAK the patch.
>> Yeah. nak to naks.
>>
>>> OTOH, you also didn't supply a patch. If you do this, I'll be
>>> glad to consider it. If I can read it, that is.
>> Yes, I plan on merging that patch as-is. If it was a compulsory part of
>> kbuild then that would be a problem but as some optional tool I don't think
>> that a bashism matters much. Someone can fix it sometime should they feel
>> so motivated.
>
> Oleg didn't express it very polite, but he has a valid point that bash
> scripts should start with "#!/bin/bash" since /bin/sh might be some
> shell other than bash.
>
> Randy, am I right to assume that such a change to your patch would be OK?
Sure.
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists