| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070624200837.16e11305@the-village.bc.nu> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:08:37 +0100 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczek@...y.mif.pg.gda.pl> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ? On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:51:38 +0200 (CEST) Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczek@...y.mif.pg.gda.pl> wrote: > > Few dayas ago OSS source code was oppened uder CDDL for Solaris and GLPv2 > for Linux: > > http://www.opensound.com/press/2007/oss-gpl-cddl.txt > > So this source without problems code can be integragrated in Linus tree > and after this Linux can provide much better soud supoport than > with current ALSA. Years ago Linux dumped OSS for ALSA because ALSA offered far better functionality and support. Why would we go back to the stone age ? Its something useful to various other platforms with basically no hardware support but Linux has ALSA and very good hardware support and ALSA even has emulation for back compatibility with old OSS apps. Ten years ago it would probably have made a difference, five maybe, today its a release of historical code at best, and since they shipped binary modules for Linux more like 'getting around to complying with the licence' than anything else. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists