[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <467EC909.9040006@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 13:42:01 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: enricoss@...cali.it, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Subject: Re: hsm violation
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:32:22 +0200 Enrico Sardi <enricoss@...cali.it> wrote:
>> [ 61.176000] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x2 SAct 0x2 SErr 0x0 action 0x2
>> frozen
>> [ 61.176000] ata1.00: (spurious completions during NCQ issue=0x0
>> SAct=0x2 FIS=005040a1:00000004)
..
>
> It's not obvious (to me) whether this is a driver bug, a hardware bug,
> expected-normal-behaviour or what - those diagnostics (which we get to
> see distressingly frequently) are pretty obscure.
The spurious completions during NCQ error is indicating that the drive
has indicated it's completed NCQ command tags which weren't outstanding.
It's normally a result of a bad NCQ implementation on the drive.
Technically we can live with it, but it's rather dangerous (if it
indicates completions for non-outstanding commands, how do we know it
doesn't indicate completions for actually outstanding commands that
aren't actually completed yet..)
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@...pamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists