[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706241342340.12806@asgard.lang.hm>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 13:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: david@...g.hm
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
cc: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>, djones@...sove.com,
LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scaling Max IP address limitation
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Jun 24 2007 15:08, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>>
>> Do you really need that many IP addresses? When somebody finally gets
>> around to implementing REDIRECT support for ip6tables then you could
>> just redirect them all to the same port on the local system.
>
> The way I see it, it's: "if someone gets around to implement *IPv6 NAT*"
> (which, if its designers were asked, is contrary to the idea of ipv6).
true, but back in the real world it's sometimes desriable to hid _chich_
specific machine somethign comes from. so I expect that implementation of
NAT is going tohappen at some point before it's widely deployed.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists