linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:07:15 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Neil Booth <neil@...kokuya.co.uk>
Cc:	Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions

On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 06:42:53AM +0900, Neil Booth wrote:
> > such a big deal...  Parser would need to accept
> > 	ident ( \[ expr \] | . ident )*
> 
> don't forget -> if you're going to accept extra stuff.  GCC forgot ->
> with the parser rewrite, yes I filed a PR.

In offsetof() second argument???  Ah, hell...  You mean the situations
like offsetof(struct foo, x->a) in
struct foo {
	struct {
		int a;
	} x[10];
};

OK...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/