[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070624041424.GK6909@holomorphy.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 21:14:24 -0700
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>
Cc: Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: JIT emulator needs
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 02:35:22AM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
>>> c. open() flag to unlink a file before returning the fd
On Jun 19, 2007, at 11:08:24, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> You probably want a tmpfile(3) -like affair which never has a
>> pathname to begin with. It could be useful for security purposes
>> more generally.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:52:12PM -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> maybe this: open("/some/dir", O_TMPFILE);
> and this? open("/some/dir", O_TMPFILE|O_DIRECTORY);
> The former would return a filehandle to a new anonymous file
> somewhere on whatever filesystem backs the specified path. The
> latter would do the same, except create an anonymous directory where
> you could use "openat()" or something. Presumably "lsof" and "/proc"
> should show either type of handle as referring to either "/some/
> filesystem/" or "/some/filesystem/ (anonymous temp file)" or something.
This is plausible (and I did indeed consider the file variant),
though it may require more infrastructure than for tmpfs only.
It may be worth clarifying that I have no concrete plans to work on
the JIT emulator issues myself. I'm only disseminating ideas I think
will pass review. I expect others to take up the issue(s) perhaps with
some inspiration from what I described. I may review some, but I have
a large review backlog as things now stand.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists